Small bull in a large China shop
April 16, 2018

This week's investment theme musings at Coutts come from Sven Balzer, Head of Investment Strategy at the exclusive private bank.

Trading blows – a small bull in a large China shop

Markets are getting nervous about tariffs but can they derail economic growth?

We think a fully-fledged trade conflict is unlikely despite bellicose headlines and that economic fundamentals will ultimately win through against nervous sentiment.

What's at stake?

As with any conflict, both sides have something at stake. The US wants greater access to China's market and adequate compensation for American intellectual property rights, for example in technology which has benefitted China's rapid development in recent years.

China, in our view, will be striving to maintain the status quo as far as possible. This will protect its role in the global supply chain, which has grown dramatically, and leave it to pursue its domestic agenda.

For the world at large, a material and prolonged trade war could be very bad news. On Wednesday, the head of the International Monetary Fund Christine Lagarde warned that the current system of world trade was "in danger of being torn apart". 

A trade war, she said, could disrupt global growth and hit consumers hardest. She urged countries to use domestic policy, rather than trade barriers, to address any imbalances, and to use international forums to settle disputes rather than tit-for-tat tariff raising.

Jaw-jaw not war-war

We don't see the current spat escalating into a full-blown conflict. It's most likely that negotiation, which continues in private between China and the US, will lead to concessions from China that will let Mr Trump claim victory. Meanwhile, China's place in the global economy will remain sheltered from major adverse effects, allowing it to re-orient itself with a stronger, service-based economy based on domestic demand.

Last week, Chinese President Xi Jinping reiterated earlier promises to open up the Chinese economy to foreign financial services companies, reduce limits on foreign investment in the auto, shipbuilding and aviation industries, and lower import tariffs on cars.

Mr Trump has offered a conciliatory response, and we believe that the frictions are unlikely to escalate before both sides evaluate the results of any negotiations.

Market impact

The market nerves over the battle drums have seen a rise in negative sentiment, contributing to sell-offs in equities and bonds at the higher-risk end of the credit spectrum.

Emerging markets and export-oriented economies – such as Germany, Sweden, Korea and Taiwan – may suffer the most in the short term, although local currency weakness may act as a counterbalance. The technology, mining and commodities sectors may also see some softening as they are likely to be targeted by sanctions or a slowdown in Chinese activity.

On the positive side, government bonds may benefit from ‘risk-off' activity and companies with a domestic focus, rather than exporters, may begin to look appealing to investors.

In the longer term, we see the effect of this bellicosity declining as the parties reach consensus and the longer-term market fundamentals re-establish themselves. Economic growth and corporate earnings should support investor confidence once more.

War is over, if you want it?

The chance of an entrenched trade conflict is small in our view. If this were to happen, the US administration could push hard for deeper concessions than the Chinese are willing to accept, piling on further punitive measures. In response, China could make long-term changes to its structure to make it more self-sufficient and less dependent on the US.

In this extreme scenario we could see disruption to global trade leading to some of the darker consequences suggested by Ms Lagarde and others. Valuations could fall and corporate earnings could be negatively affected. Exporters and cyclical sectors would be the most vulnerable, and high yield bonds could become much more risky. Safe haven assets – government bonds, the US dollar, gold – and defensive, domestic sectors would become the places to be.

A breakdown in global trade is not in the interest of either China or the US, as the main actors in this drama are well aware. Mr Trump prides himself on his ability to make a deal, and we believe that China will be able to make sufficient concessions without sacrificing its economic growth.

 





This site, like many others, uses small files called cookies to customize your experience. Cookies appear to be blocked on this browser. Please consider allowing cookies so that you can enjoy more content across globalcustody.net.

How do I enable cookies in my browser?

Internet Explorer
1. Click the Tools button (or press ALT and T on the keyboard), and then click Internet Options.
2. Click the Privacy tab
3. Move the slider away from 'Block all cookies' to a setting you're comfortable with.

Firefox
1. At the top of the Firefox window, click on the Tools menu and select Options...
2. Select the Privacy panel.
3. Set Firefox will: to Use custom settings for history.
4. Make sure Accept cookies from sites is selected.

Safari Browser
1. Click Safari icon in Menu Bar
2. Click Preferences (gear icon)
3. Click Security icon
4. Accept cookies: select Radio button "only from sites I visit"

Chrome
1. Click the menu icon to the right of the address bar (looks like 3 lines)
2. Click Settings
3. Click the "Show advanced settings" tab at the bottom
4. Click the "Content settings..." button in the Privacy section
5. At the top under Cookies make sure it is set to "Allow local data to be set (recommended)"

Opera
1. Click the red O button in the upper left hand corner
2. Select Settings -> Preferences
3. Select the Advanced Tab
4. Select Cookies in the list on the left side
5. Set it to "Accept cookies" or "Accept cookies only from the sites I visit"
6. Click OK

This week's investment theme musings at Coutts come from Sven Balzer, Head of Investment Strategy at the exclusive private bank.

Trading blows – a small bull in a large China shop

Markets are getting nervous about tariffs but can they derail economic growth?

We think a fully-fledged trade conflict is unlikely despite bellicose headlines and that economic fundamentals will ultimately win through against nervous sentiment.

What's at stake?

As with any conflict, both sides have something at stake. The US wants greater access to China's market and adequate compensation for American intellectual property rights, for example in technology which has benefitted China's rapid development in recent years.

China, in our view, will be striving to maintain the status quo as far as possible. This will protect its role in the global supply chain, which has grown dramatically, and leave it to pursue its domestic agenda.

For the world at large, a material and prolonged trade war could be very bad news. On Wednesday, the head of the International Monetary Fund Christine Lagarde warned that the current system of world trade was "in danger of being torn apart". 

A trade war, she said, could disrupt global growth and hit consumers hardest. She urged countries to use domestic policy, rather than trade barriers, to address any imbalances, and to use international forums to settle disputes rather than tit-for-tat tariff raising.

Jaw-jaw not war-war

We don't see the current spat escalating into a full-blown conflict. It's most likely that negotiation, which continues in private between China and the US, will lead to concessions from China that will let Mr Trump claim victory. Meanwhile, China's place in the global economy will remain sheltered from major adverse effects, allowing it to re-orient itself with a stronger, service-based economy based on domestic demand.

Last week, Chinese President Xi Jinping reiterated earlier promises to open up the Chinese economy to foreign financial services companies, reduce limits on foreign investment in the auto, shipbuilding and aviation industries, and lower import tariffs on cars.

Mr Trump has offered a conciliatory response, and we believe that the frictions are unlikely to escalate before both sides evaluate the results of any negotiations.

Market impact

The market nerves over the battle drums have seen a rise in negative sentiment, contributing to sell-offs in equities and bonds at the higher-risk end of the credit spectrum.

Emerging markets and export-oriented economies – such as Germany, Sweden, Korea and Taiwan – may suffer the most in the short term, although local currency weakness may act as a counterbalance. The technology, mining and commodities sectors may also see some softening as they are likely to be targeted by sanctions or a slowdown in Chinese activity.

On the positive side, government bonds may benefit from ‘risk-off' activity and companies with a domestic focus, rather than exporters, may begin to look appealing to investors.

In the longer term, we see the effect of this bellicosity declining as the parties reach consensus and the longer-term market fundamentals re-establish themselves. Economic growth and corporate earnings should support investor confidence once more.

War is over, if you want it?

The chance of an entrenched trade conflict is small in our view. If this were to happen, the US administration could push hard for deeper concessions than the Chinese are willing to accept, piling on further punitive measures. In response, China could make long-term changes to its structure to make it more self-sufficient and less dependent on the US.

In this extreme scenario we could see disruption to global trade leading to some of the darker consequences suggested by Ms Lagarde and others. Valuations could fall and corporate earnings could be negatively affected. Exporters and cyclical sectors would be the most vulnerable, and high yield bonds could become much more risky. Safe haven assets – government bonds, the US dollar, gold – and defensive, domestic sectors would become the places to be.

A breakdown in global trade is not in the interest of either China or the US, as the main actors in this drama are well aware. Mr Trump prides himself on his ability to make a deal, and we believe that China will be able to make sufficient concessions without sacrificing its economic growth.

 



Free subscription - selected news and optional newsletter
Premium subscription
  • All latest news
  • Latest special reports
  • Your choice of newsletter timing and topics
Full-access magazine subscription
  • 7-year archive of news
  • All past special reports
  • Newsletter with your choice of timing and topics
  • Access to more content across the site