From the desk of Amin Rajan, CEO, CREATE-Research
The idea that companies that are rated high on a myriad of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics will deliver superior investment returns has long lost its currency. The key issue now is how far ESG considerations are pertinent to a company's business performance.
Materiality, as an investment concept, has thus come to the fore with the rapid rise in global assets flowing into ESG investing over the past three years.
This is because robust templates, consistent definitions and reliable data are still evolving. As a result, institutional investors are now treating engagement with their investee companies as a catalyst for change on the ground.
Hitherto, engagement was often merely a tick-box exercise for compliance experts. However, two high-profile corporate disasters in the US in this decade have proved a turning point: BP's Deep Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 and Volkswagen's emission-cheating scandal in 2014.
In both cases, their shareholders were branded as financial bandits with no regard for their social or ethical responsibilities. They were deemed to have failed to exercise their ‘duty of care' in minimising negative externalities that often result from day-to-day corporate activities that inflict uncompensated costs on wider society, while also exposing wrong-doers to existential risks.
The emerging model of engagement seeks to future-proof investee companies by identifying and mitigating all manner of risks – especially sustainability risks. The new model relies on a year-round dialogue with investee companies beyond shareholder meetings on issues that impact on long-term value creation.
Specifically, engagement seeks to re-emphasise the core purpose of financial markets in channelling capital to growing businesses and ensuring that their operations impose least harm on the environment.
The key aim is to deliver businesses of enduring value – for their shareholders, employees and society.
This site, like many others, uses small files called cookies to customize your experience. Cookies appear to be blocked on this browser. Please consider allowing cookies so that you can enjoy more content across globalcustody.net.
How do I enable cookies in my browser?
Internet Explorer
1. Click the Tools button (or press ALT and T on the keyboard), and then click Internet Options.
2. Click the Privacy tab
3. Move the slider away from 'Block all cookies' to a setting you're comfortable with.
Firefox
1. At the top of the Firefox window, click on the Tools menu and select Options...
2. Select the Privacy panel.
3. Set Firefox will: to Use custom settings for history.
4. Make sure Accept cookies from sites is selected.
Safari Browser
1. Click Safari icon in Menu Bar
2. Click Preferences (gear icon)
3. Click Security icon
4. Accept cookies: select Radio button "only from sites I visit"
Chrome
1. Click the menu icon to the right of the address bar (looks like 3 lines)
2. Click Settings
3. Click the "Show advanced settings" tab at the bottom
4. Click the "Content settings..." button in the Privacy section
5. At the top under Cookies make sure it is set to "Allow local data to be set (recommended)"
Opera
1. Click the red O button in the upper left hand corner
2. Select Settings -> Preferences
3. Select the Advanced Tab
4. Select Cookies in the list on the left side
5. Set it to "Accept cookies" or "Accept cookies only from the sites I visit"
6. Click OK
From the desk of Amin Rajan, CEO, CREATE-Research
The idea that companies that are rated high on a myriad of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics will deliver superior investment returns has long lost its currency. The key issue now is how far ESG considerations are pertinent to a company's business performance.
Materiality, as an investment concept, has thus come to the fore with the rapid rise in global assets flowing into ESG investing over the past three years.
This is because robust templates, consistent definitions and reliable data are still evolving. As a result, institutional investors are now treating engagement with their investee companies as a catalyst for change on the ground.
Hitherto, engagement was often merely a tick-box exercise for compliance experts. However, two high-profile corporate disasters in the US in this decade have proved a turning point: BP's Deep Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 and Volkswagen's emission-cheating scandal in 2014.
In both cases, their shareholders were branded as financial bandits with no regard for their social or ethical responsibilities. They were deemed to have failed to exercise their ‘duty of care' in minimising negative externalities that often result from day-to-day corporate activities that inflict uncompensated costs on wider society, while also exposing wrong-doers to existential risks.
The emerging model of engagement seeks to future-proof investee companies by identifying and mitigating all manner of risks – especially sustainability risks. The new model relies on a year-round dialogue with investee companies beyond shareholder meetings on issues that impact on long-term value creation.
Specifically, engagement seeks to re-emphasise the core purpose of financial markets in channelling capital to growing businesses and ensuring that their operations impose least harm on the environment.
The key aim is to deliver businesses of enduring value – for their shareholders, employees and society.
